The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
نویسندگان
چکیده
Julian P T Higgins senior statistician , Douglas G Altman director , Peter C Gøtzsche director , Peter Jüni head of division , David Moher senior scientist 5 , Andrew D Oxman senior researcher , Jelena Savović postdoctoral fellow , Kenneth F Schulz vice president , Laura Weeks research associate , Jonathan A C Sterne professor of medical statistics and epidemiology , Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Lifestyle Intervention on Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes on Obese Infertile Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Obesity has been associated to negative effects on natural fertility and a worse prognosis when assisted reproduction techniques are performed. Patients attending for fertility treatments are often advised to optimize their weights to improve outcomes. There are doubts about how effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women who are overweight or obese. Mat...
متن کاملLow-quality Trials as a Source of Heterogeneity in the Association of Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 or 0.42 with Excess Mortality in Sepsis
In the methods section, they stated that risk assessment was performed as advised by the Cochrane collaboration. Assessment includes “randomization sequence generation,” “allocation concealment,” “blinding,” “incomplete outcome data,” and “selective outcome reporting.” In Table 2 of Ma et al.[1] however, assessed domains differed with “intention‐to‐treat analysis” and “no loss to follow‐up” rep...
متن کاملEvaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
BACKGROUND In 2008, the Cochrane Collaboration introduced a tool for assessing the risk of bias in clinical trials included in Cochrane reviews. The risk of bias (RoB) tool is based on narrative descriptions of evidence-based methodological features known to increase the risk of bias in trials. METHODS To assess the usability of this tool, we conducted an evaluation by means of focus groups, ...
متن کاملتورشها در مطالعات کارآزمایی کنترلدار تصادفی منتشرشده در نشریههای تخصصی پرستاری و مامایی ایران در سال 1389
Background & Objectives: Randomized controlled trials are the most reliable type of study to be able to compare different interventions in scientific research. The introduction of bias into the design and conduct of randomized controlled trials can seriously affect the accuracy of the results and led to the results be invalid. The aim of this study was to assess the bias in randomized controlle...
متن کاملA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
Background and Purpose: The dapagliflozin’s safety profile in insulin-treated adult type-1 diabetes mellites (T1DM) patients remains poorly explored. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared the risk of all-cause side effects, study discontinuation of participants due to side effects, urinary tract infection (UTI), diabetic ketoacidosis, and hypoglycemia between dapagliflozi...
متن کامل